64% Of Re-Engagement Revenue Comes From Users You Wrote Off

Owned Channels Work:

{{ include_custom_fonts({"Apptrove Clash Display":["Light","Medium","Regular","Semi Bold"]}) }}

Hey there, {{ personalization_token('contact.firstname', 'Marketer') }}

{{ include_custom_fonts({"Apptrove Clash Display":["Light","Medium","Regular","Semi Bold"]}) }}

Silence isn't the same as gone.

 

Most win-back programs run on one inherited assumption: the longer a user's been quiet, the less they're worth. Apptrove analyzed 7.2 million re-engagement events and traced 29,806 completed purchases end to end, and the data says the opposite. Users dormant 90+ days deliver 87% higher order value than same-day re-engagement, and they're not a small tail, they're the single largest cohort in the entire dataset.

 

{{ include_custom_fonts({"Apptrove Clash Display":["Light","Medium","Regular","Semi Bold"]}) }}

Checkout Leaks Revenue:

{{ include_custom_fonts({"Apptrove Clash Display":["Light","Medium","Regular","Semi Bold"]}) }}

Wait More, Spend More:

98.8% of re-engagement runs through SMS and push, not paid media at all really

 

{{ include_custom_fonts({"Apptrove Clash Display":["Light","Medium","Regular","Semi Bold"]}) }}

 

None of this shows up if a program stops targeting at 30 days. The users worth the most are the ones most win-back logic excludes first, and the biggest revenue leak isn't a targeting problem, it's a checkout one, sitting entirely outside the re-engagement function itself. 

 

{{ include_custom_fonts({"Apptrove Clash Display":["Light","Medium","Regular","Semi Bold"]}) }}

Get The Report

See The Full Data

The real leak isn't targeting, it's what happens at checkout.

Preview Text This will be used as the preview text that displays in some email clients