

30-09-2026
64% Of Re-Engagement Revenue Comes From Users You Wrote Off
Owned Channels Work:
Order value keeps steadily climbing the longer a user's been gone, $80 same-day, $149 at 90+
Hey there, {{ personalization_token('contact.firstname', 'Marketer') }}
{{ include_custom_fonts({"Apptrove Clash Display":["Light","Medium","Regular","Semi Bold"]}) }}Silence isn't the same as gone.
Most win-back programs run on one inherited assumption: the longer a user's been quiet, the less they're worth. Apptrove analyzed 7.2 million re-engagement events and traced 29,806 completed purchases end to end, and the data says the opposite. Users dormant 90+ days deliver 87% higher order value than same-day re-engagement, and they're not a small tail, they're the single largest cohort in the entire dataset.
{{ include_custom_fonts({"Apptrove Clash Display":["Light","Medium","Regular","Semi Bold"]}) }}
Checkout Leaks Revenue:
Half of payment attempts by re-engaged users fail, the costliest drop-off isn't targeting
Wait More, Spend More:
98.8% of re-engagement runs through SMS and push, not paid media at all really
{{ include_custom_fonts({"Apptrove Clash Display":["Light","Medium","Regular","Semi Bold"]}) }}
None of this shows up if a program stops targeting at 30 days. The users worth the most are the ones most win-back logic excludes first, and the biggest revenue leak isn't a targeting problem, it's a checkout one, sitting entirely outside the re-engagement function itself.
{{ include_custom_fonts({"Apptrove Clash Display":["Light","Medium","Regular","Semi Bold"]}) }}
Get The Report
See The Full Data
The real leak isn't targeting, it's what happens at checkout.
Preview Text This will be used as the preview text that displays in some email clients.png.png)



