ARPU vs ARPPU: Which Metric Tells You the Real Story Behind Your App Revenue?

Here’s a reality check most app teams face sooner or later: only 0.5% mobile apps achieve sustainable monetization on average. The problem usually isn’t traffic. Its interpretation.

You’re tracking revenue. You’re looking at dashboards. Yet when it’s time to scale spend or justify performance, the numbers don’t always give you confidence. This is exactly where the conversation around ARPU vs ARPPU becomes critical, not as definitions, but as decision-making tools.

If your revenue metrics aren’t backed by clean attribution and user-level visibility from an MMP like Apptrove, they can look accurate while quietly leading you in the wrong direction.

Let’s break this down in a way that actually helps you make better calls.

Why Revenue Metrics Need Context (Not Just Formulas)

Think of your app like a café. You don’t just want to know how much money came in today,  you want to know:

• How many people walked in
• How many actually bought something
• How much those buyers spent
• And whether tomorrow looks better than today

ARPU and ARPPU answer different parts of that story. When you understand how they work together, your revenue picture sharpens immediately.

What ARPU Really Tells You About Your App

Average Revenue Per User shows how much revenue your app generates per user, whether they ever pay or not.

When you look at ARPU, you’re answering a big-picture question:
“Is my app monetizing its user base efficiently?”

This metric is especially useful when you’re:

• Comparing acquisition channels
• Evaluating campaign profitability
• Aligning user acquisition cost with revenue potential

Now let’s address the common question teams ask.

How to calculate ARPU?

You divide your total revenue in a given period by the total number of users during that same period.

Simple formula. But without accurate attribution and revenue tracking, the output can be misleading. That’s why ARPU works best when it’s tied to cohort analysis and channel-level data through your MMP.

What ARPPU Zooms In On

Average Revenue Per Paying User shifts the focus. Instead of looking at everyone, it looks only at users who actually spend.

This metric helps you understand payer behavior, not overall reach.

You typically rely on ARPPU when you want to:

• Evaluate pricing or subscription tiers
• Measure the impact of upsells
• Understand how valuable your paying users really are

How to calculate ARPPU?

You divide total revenue by the number of paying users in the same timeframe.

Again, straightforward,  but only meaningful when “paying user” is defined consistently across platforms and attribution sources.

ARPU vs ARPPU & Why You Need Both

Here’s where most teams get stuck. They try to pick one metric as “better.”

That’s the wrong approach.

The real insight lies in the ARPU and ARPPU difference.

If your ARPPU looks strong but ARPU stays low, it usually means a small group of users is carrying your revenue. You’re monetizing well,  but not broadly.

If ARPU improves while ARPPU remains steady, it often signals better conversion across your user base. More users are paying, even if they aren’t spending more individually.

Seen together, these metrics tell you whether growth should focus on conversion, pricing, or acquisition quality.

Why Relying on Just One Metric Can Hurt Growth

If you only track ARPPU, you might feel confident while ignoring the fact that most of your users never convert.

If you only track ARPU, you might undervalue a strong payer segment that could scale with better lifecycle marketing.

This is where app marketing analytics matures,  when you stop looking at isolated numbers and start connecting them.

Where Your MMP Becomes Non-Negotiable

Revenue metrics depend heavily on the accuracy of revenue attribution.

Without a Mobile Measurement Partner:

• Revenue may not map correctly to acquisition channels
• Payers may be misattributed or duplicated
• Cohort performance becomes guesswork

With an MMP like Apptrove, you can:

• Track user-level revenue events
• Analyze ARPU by channel, campaign, or geography
• Understand payer behavior through cohort analysis
• Connect monetization with retention and re-engagement data

That’s when ARPU and ARPPU stop being static numbers and start guiding decisions.

How You Should Actually Use These Metrics

ARPU helps you decide where to spend.
ARPPU helps you decide how to monetize better.

When you align both with attribution data, you can:

• Identify high-value acquisition sources
• Spot underperforming cohorts early
• Optimize monetization flows without killing retention

This is especially important if your app runs freemium, subscription, or hybrid monetization models.

Real-World App Scenarios You’ll Recognize

If you’re running paid campaigns and see installs growing but ARPU staying flat, the issue likely isn’t traffic,  it’s monetization efficiency. If your ARPPU increases after a pricing change but overall revenue doesn’t move, you may be shrinking your payer base.

These patterns only become obvious when both metrics are tracked consistently and reviewed together.

1. Gaming Apps: High ARPPU, Low ARPU Isn’t Always a Win

The most obvious reason as to why ARPU and ARPPU should be read together is mobile gaming.

Sensor Tower showed that less than 5% of mobile games users actually purchase, but those who do, spend a lot. Indeed, the top 10% of paying customers may provide more than half-a-billion of all in-app purchase income in numerous mid-core and casino games.

What this looks like in metrics:

ARPPU:Very high (strong payer monetization)

ARPU: Small or stagnant (the majority of users do not convert)

When a game studio only looks at ARPPU it might believe that it is being monetized. ARPU however tells the true story: the payer base is very limited to generate revenue. In this instance, growth does not happen through spending more on acquisition it happens through better conversion and onboarding on the first stage.

2. Subscription Apps: ARPU Growth Signals Healthier Monetization

The case is different with subscription-based apps, particularly those that apply in the fitness, productivity, and media sectors.

The high retention in subscription apps is normally accompanied by a stable ARPU growth despite ARPPU being steady. Why? Due to the increased percentage of users upgrading to paid plans over time and not because of the individual users upgrading and spending more.

For example:

• An app called meditation offers a free trial of 7 days.
• ARPPU also remains constant (price of subscription the same).
• The ARPU is growing at 15-25% per quarter with a larger number of users switching to paid.

This is an indicator of the healthy monetization growth throughout the user base not a diddering deeper into the current payer base.

3. E-commerce Apps: When ARPU Reveals Channel Quality

ARPU is one of the metrics that reveals inefficiencies in acquiring in e-commerce applications. Although paid social campaigns can be highly install volume, organic and referral channels will always generate much higher ARPU in 90-day cohorts.

What happens if teams track only ARPPU?

• Paying users from paid channels may spend similarly to organic users.
• ARPPU looks “healthy.”
• ARPU demonstrates that a significant share of installed on paid basis is never converted.

This observation can only be made clear when revenue is disaggregated by acquisition sources using the user level, which cannot be achieved without clean MMP attribution.

4. Freemium Apps: ARPPU Can Improve While Revenue Stagnates

The freemium application can be easily trapped. An increase in ARPPU can be achieved through either a change in pricing or launching of a premium feature, and this will extract more out of current payers, but usually will cause a decline in conversion of free and paid users.

To put the case in context, according to industry standards, rates of freemium conversion are usually between 2% and 5% – that is, a very small percentage of free users ever become paying users at all.

Metric pattern in this scenario might look like:

• ARPPU: Up
• ARPU: Flat or declining
• Total revenue: Unchanged or variable

Without tracking both the ARPU and ARPPU simultaneously, and how variations in price impact conversion, teams would only think that high ARPPU is success, when in reality, the number of payers is declining or even stagnating since the percentage of free users converting is very low.

5. Why These Patterns Only Make Sense With Proper Attribution

In all these illustrations there is a single theme:

ARPU and ARPPU can only be made meaningful when revenue is properly attributed to users, cohorts and channels.The benchmarking of industries demonstrates many times over that teams that lack user-level attribution:

1. Underestimate channel performance.
2. Misjudge payer behavior
3. Sustainably unsustainable scale campaigns that appear profitable.

This is the reason why contemporary app teams turn to MMP-supported revenue tracking to understand ARPU vs ARPPU rightly not as fixed KPIs but as guidance indicators on growth-related decisions.

Turning Metrics Into Confident Decisions

When revenue metrics are backed by accurate attribution, you stop reacting and start predicting.

You know:

• Which users are worth acquiring
• Which features actually drive spending
• Which channels deserve scale,  and which don’t

That’s when growth feels intentional instead of experimental.

Final Takeaway

The discussion around ARPU vs ARPPU isn’t about formulas. It’s about clarity.

One metric shows you how well your app monetizes everyone.
The other shows you how deeply it monetizes those who pay.

When both are calculated correctly,  and supported by a solid MMP,  you stop guessing and start scaling with confidence.

FAQs